Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-14 12:37:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E7C7E2C69943B250FB57BC0F500BD1DB1C904C6B11C22B77D93C408027FF1745
Participant Details

Original Note:

The author of the piece on the Guardian was painting a scenario to illustrate the contradictions and complexities around enforcing laws on child pornography, in particular in regards to claims of “accidental” visits to websites containing CSAM. Original article: https://www.theguardian.com/society/2003/jan/14/childprotection.rodliddle

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856852712001786149
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E7C7E2C69943B250FB57BC0F500BD1DB1C904C6B11C22B77D93C408027FF1745
  • createdAtMillis - 1731587879646
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1856852712001786149E7C7E2C69943B250FB57BC0F500BD1DB1C904C6B11C22B77D93C408027FF1745