Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-13 17:52:05 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 67CE103529549E7D0D3768B18145AFDAE47CFA657ABE1B551A7F824296FE7D5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

They stayed too long with homesales and did not sell in shops or online. Also because the patents expired 40 years ago and the competitors are cheaper and available online. It is not that the product was too good, but because they didn't change with the (online-) market. https://www.reuters.com/graphics/TUPPERWARE-BANKRUPTCY/lgvdjnejkvo/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1856733048017990143
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 67CE103529549E7D0D3768B18145AFDAE47CFA657ABE1B551A7F824296FE7D5F
createdAtMillis - 1731520325695
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 185673304801799014367CE103529549E7D0D3768B18145AFDAE47CFA657ABE1B551A7F824296FE7D5F