Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-14 04:36:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 6D9E4FDE46506626DC4FFFFF16FB97B16A17F8BD2B2E909A3CED0652A0156005
Participant Details

Original Note:

この投稿は単なる私見の表明です。 したがって、この投稿が批判の対象としている、2名の議員が外務及び内閣府の政務官に起用される件について、当該議員らの過去の実績を指摘するノートも、失態を指摘するノートもいずれも不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856724171163926890
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 6D9E4FDE46506626DC4FFFFF16FB97B16A17F8BD2B2E909A3CED0652A0156005
  • createdAtMillis - 1731559009064
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18567241711639268906D9E4FDE46506626DC4FFFFF16FB97B16A17F8BD2B2E909A3CED0652A0156005