Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-13 23:37:49 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 499B2AB5842EBD1A58C4A0035A36EE3BFC56C41C0251ECB1F40611C9A0B5ACCE
Participant Details

Original Note:

この投稿は単なる私見の表明です。 したがって、この投稿が批判の対象としている、2名の議員が外務及び内閣府の政務官に起用される件について、当該議員らの過去の実績を指摘するノートも、失態を指摘するノートもいずれも不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856724171163926890
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 499B2AB5842EBD1A58C4A0035A36EE3BFC56C41C0251ECB1F40611C9A0B5ACCE
  • createdAtMillis - 1731541069688
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1856724171163926890499B2AB5842EBD1A58C4A0035A36EE3BFC56C41C0251ECB1F40611C9A0B5ACCE