Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-15 01:40:32 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0E4A8177A3F4895B69C015A06E6E4F80584EE2427410A237CE2889F155EADA60
Participant Details

Original Note:

この投稿は単なる私見の表明です。 したがって、この投稿が批判の対象としている、2名の議員が外務及び内閣府の政務官に起用される件について、当該議員らの過去の実績を指摘するノートも、失態を指摘するノートもいずれも不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856724171163926890
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0E4A8177A3F4895B69C015A06E6E4F80584EE2427410A237CE2889F155EADA60
  • createdAtMillis - 1731634832183
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18567241711639268900E4A8177A3F4895B69C015A06E6E4F80584EE2427410A237CE2889F155EADA60