Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-12 22:32:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 663F2E115DE5BCA50F77408E39797D7E68F463C642D8BA68A174A5F6CB6AA6D6
Participant Details

Original Note:

(Sobre la eliminación de la caña)"OBJETIVOS -Controlar su influencia en la capacidad de transporte del cauce en crecidas ordinarias. -Reducción de los posibles efectos en el entorno de infraes tructuras (puentes, pasos etc.)" Gia del MITECO (2019). https://www.miteco.gob.es/content/dam/miteco/es/agua/publicaciones/guia-buenas-practicas-en-actuaciones-conservacion-mantenimiento-mejora-cauces_tcm30-503733.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856421171518157094
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 663F2E115DE5BCA50F77408E39797D7E68F463C642D8BA68A174A5F6CB6AA6D6
  • createdAtMillis - 1731450751183
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1856421171518157094663F2E115DE5BCA50F77408E39797D7E68F463C642D8BA68A174A5F6CB6AA6D6