Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-13 10:50:38 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 33DCAD64BE1BBB9C3FAC5EDB3C1F80B14F0CD945B905797271E7B01B6956F765
Participant Details

Original Note:

(Sobre la eliminación de la caña)"OBJETIVOS -Controlar su influencia en la capacidad de transporte del cauce en crecidas ordinarias. -Reducción de los posibles efectos en el entorno de infraes tructuras (puentes, pasos etc.)" Gia del MITECO (2019). https://www.miteco.gob.es/content/dam/miteco/es/agua/publicaciones/guia-buenas-practicas-en-actuaciones-conservacion-mantenimiento-mejora-cauces_tcm30-503733.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1856421171518157094
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 33DCAD64BE1BBB9C3FAC5EDB3C1F80B14F0CD945B905797271E7B01B6956F765
createdAtMillis - 1731495038925
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 185642117151815709433DCAD64BE1BBB9C3FAC5EDB3C1F80B14F0CD945B905797271E7B01B6956F765