Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-13 07:19:27 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AE53C6FFAD834F5DEA904EE5E260C266B5562800ACB85A3933FA9FC472E2635D
Participant Details

Original Note:

Though the WAPO did not endorse a candidate most of its articles supported Harris and vilified trump. Regardless of what Jeff said the reader of the paper saw Harris supporting material. here is a new one: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/11/06/second-trump-resistance/ Here is another: https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2024/10/27/2024-election-campaign-updates-harris-trump/ And another: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/10/15/trump-strategy-harris-campaign/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856411281227497531
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AE53C6FFAD834F5DEA904EE5E260C266B5562800ACB85A3933FA9FC472E2635D
  • createdAtMillis - 1731482367378
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1856411281227497531AE53C6FFAD834F5DEA904EE5E260C266B5562800ACB85A3933FA9FC472E2635D