Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-12 18:49:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8DD7922A26C0D3505317248D2C653A64CB594DC7696EEC3915114D6DADF3F3EA
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN. La fuente no la respalda, no compara con el "promedio histórico previo" de propietarios, que además es un concepto poco claro. Para trollear, diviértanse en citas y comentarios! Mínimo de rigurosidad (Ks y Ls por igual): el dato a debatir, si lo hay, es el nro. de viviendas.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856378158200586573
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8DD7922A26C0D3505317248D2C653A64CB594DC7696EEC3915114D6DADF3F3EA
  • createdAtMillis - 1731437392958
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18563781582005865738DD7922A26C0D3505317248D2C653A64CB594DC7696EEC3915114D6DADF3F3EA