Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-12 12:39:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FABEB32DAD06959E289990DA437B8016C22E93B50F7E8DDBE37F086E2ADCFD6F
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nothing in the claim is factually incorrect. He indeed was an author and lied about having no knowledge of Project 2025. All the suggested CNs are just injecting political biases. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856195789812326634
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FABEB32DAD06959E289990DA437B8016C22E93B50F7E8DDBE37F086E2ADCFD6F
  • createdAtMillis - 1731415162716
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1856195789812326634FABEB32DAD06959E289990DA437B8016C22E93B50F7E8DDBE37F086E2ADCFD6F