Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-12 06:16:15 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FAB1A5CC0C868ADAF65F9072F60CC46A3A75D4B513809E1A8A24D3941CA77B57
Participant Details

Original Note:

Nothing in the claim is factually incorrect. He indeed was an author and lied about having no knowledge of Project 2025. All the suggested CNs are just injecting political biases. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856195789812326634
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FAB1A5CC0C868ADAF65F9072F60CC46A3A75D4B513809E1A8A24D3941CA77B57
  • createdAtMillis - 1731392175585
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1856195789812326634FAB1A5CC0C868ADAF65F9072F60CC46A3A75D4B513809E1A8A24D3941CA77B57