Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-12 08:31:05 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 698007A4EBF9B63E443E2B14AA0046D5EB5FBC2CBBCE24F31915ED1C326D8A5F
Participant Details

Original Note:

this is fake. the original poster on tiktok has admitted it. the photo isn’t even theirs it’s taken from an article posted in 2022 that’s weird enough. huffingtonpost.co.uk/amp/entry/firs…

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1856145763186946278
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 698007A4EBF9B63E443E2B14AA0046D5EB5FBC2CBBCE24F31915ED1C326D8A5F
  • createdAtMillis - 1731400265272
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1856145763186946278698007A4EBF9B63E443E2B14AA0046D5EB5FBC2CBBCE24F31915ED1C326D8A5F