Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-10 00:15:52 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EAF3A0C4A151BC52EDEB3BB5689C9FC85515960C0086E6687D5B11E0C2E69966
Participant Details

Original Note:

この一連の投稿は刑事事件として立件不可能で犯罪とはなり得ないものであるにも関わらず、一方当事者の証言を元にした記事によりあたかも性犯罪者のごとく社会的に扱われ、その回復があまりに困難である構造について自説を述べたもので、誤解を招く内容ではありません。ノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1855372431265042887
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EAF3A0C4A151BC52EDEB3BB5689C9FC85515960C0086E6687D5B11E0C2E69966
  • createdAtMillis - 1731197752496
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1855372431265042887EAF3A0C4A151BC52EDEB3BB5689C9FC85515960C0086E6687D5B11E0C2E69966