Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-10 17:36:50 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 81B1DE98DCF51A4AFDB64F6B051851DEE8E6A21C7391D2C411E7136D4431B270
Participant Details

Original Note:

この一連の投稿は刑事事件として立件不可能で犯罪とはなり得ないものであるにも関わらず、一方当事者の証言を元にした記事によりあたかも性犯罪者のごとく社会的に扱われ、その回復があまりに困難である構造について自説を述べたもので、誤解を招く内容ではありません。ノートは不要です。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1855372431265042887
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 81B1DE98DCF51A4AFDB64F6B051851DEE8E6A21C7391D2C411E7136D4431B270
  • createdAtMillis - 1731260210331
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185537243126504288781B1DE98DCF51A4AFDB64F6B051851DEE8E6A21C7391D2C411E7136D4431B270