Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-09 18:29:35 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4ABE3EA0A84061A791DBCAFAB49FD6CBCC29325CA869B0E3AE311AA13E431795
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN : l'article reprends une affirmation de l'ONU 1/ le titre n'est donc pas trompeur. 2/ l'échantillonnage est très largement suffisant. https://fr.checkmarket.com/kb/comment-calculer-la-taille-d-echantillon/ 3/ la source est le haut commissariat des droits de l'homme Merci d'utiliser l'espace commentaire https://f24.my/AjBD

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1855227897012686867
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 4ABE3EA0A84061A791DBCAFAB49FD6CBCC29325CA869B0E3AE311AA13E431795
createdAtMillis - 1731176975327
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 18552278970126868674ABE3EA0A84061A791DBCAFAB49FD6CBCC29325CA869B0E3AE311AA13E431795