Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-11-09 11:56:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: FD7C4BA58D97CA14BA33509919C2F0723971366A2FF643E8DA541E71F0F7F8D2
Participant Details
Original Note:
On top of previous note about the sampling (8119 victims of residential housing only), sources are problematic. Page 6, « according to the Lancet » with reference to a letter, not a peer-reviewed study. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/reports/six-month-update-report-human-rights-situation-gaza-1-november-2023-30-april-2024 Same letter debunked in 2 other Lancet’s letters 1. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01683-0/fulltext?rss=yes 2. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01682-9/fulltext?rss=yes
All Note Details