Birdwatch Note Rating
2024-11-09 22:09:26 UTC - HELPFUL
Rated by Participant: 1D46519D01018F3CA8B4EF76FAC042A2F9C18ABB0B081E493E91C82A51703C6E
Participant Details
Original Note:
On top of previous note about the sampling (8119 victims of residential housing only), sources are problematic. Page 6, « according to the Lancet » with reference to a letter, not a peer-reviewed study. https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/reports/six-month-update-report-human-rights-situation-gaza-1-november-2023-30-april-2024 Same letter debunked in 2 other Lancet’s letters 1. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01683-0/fulltext?rss=yes 2. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01682-9/fulltext?rss=yes
All Note Details