Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-09 04:53:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8E44EE6829C5488BF96B8D2187F2A1662B95F1D306BB5917F31EE3FEF36A63FB
Participant Details

Original Note:

最高裁の判例では「実在しない児童の姿態を描写したものは含まない」と司法判断が示されています。 よって、フォトリアル(写真的)のみを理由に児童ポルノが販売されていたと結論付けることはできません。 https://www.courts.go.jp/app/hanrei_jp/detail2?id=89197

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1855038844334399858
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8E44EE6829C5488BF96B8D2187F2A1662B95F1D306BB5917F31EE3FEF36A63FB
  • createdAtMillis - 1731127985118
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18550388443343998588E44EE6829C5488BF96B8D2187F2A1662B95F1D306BB5917F31EE3FEF36A63FB