Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-09 07:34:36 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 73DA9CBE64C28AF530C5E73B1D75B5ECCCC0FD6CD90D8371323E49688BA40F5E
Participant Details

Original Note:

最高裁の判例では「実在しない児童の姿態を描写したものは含まない」と司法判断が示されています。 よって、フォトリアル(写真的)のみを理由に児童ポルノが販売されていたと結論付けることはできません。 https://www.courts.go.jp/app/hanrei_jp/detail2?id=89197

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1855038844334399858
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 73DA9CBE64C28AF530C5E73B1D75B5ECCCC0FD6CD90D8371323E49688BA40F5E
  • createdAtMillis - 1731137676129
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185503884433439985873DA9CBE64C28AF530C5E73B1D75B5ECCCC0FD6CD90D8371323E49688BA40F5E