Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-09 15:52:10 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E9E2EE5BA33EEAF110C47241426851B5D4F223746AB84574149801C74B847ACD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Il est faux de dire que Didier Raoult avait raison. Les études scientifiques et les faits lui ont donné tort sur chacune de ses hypothèses. - HCQ inefficace et dangereuse (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-22446-z) - mesures non Pharma efficaces (https://academic.oup.com/jtm/article/29/3/taac055/6577267?login=false) - et un scandale éthique et légal avec 20+ études rétractées (https://x.com/search?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.science.org%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2Ffailure-every-level-how-science-sleuths-exposed-massive-ethics-violations-famed-french&src=typed_query&f=live & https://researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41073-023-00134-4)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1855022695236145541
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E9E2EE5BA33EEAF110C47241426851B5D4F223746AB84574149801C74B847ACD
  • createdAtMillis - 1731167530454
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1855022695236145541E9E2EE5BA33EEAF110C47241426851B5D4F223746AB84574149801C74B847ACD