Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-09 03:43:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: EC52791536D05BFE8723B04A83961E68B42C57691509F64F5F5FB4DC017A3D4E
Participant Details

Original Note:

About proposed CN from Supreme Watermelon Kestrel, it’s practically impossible to prove a negative assertion such as “there are no reports of…” An appropriate response, instead of a CN, would be to reply to OP and request proof of the OP’s assertion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854999560030208277
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - EC52791536D05BFE8723B04A83961E68B42C57691509F64F5F5FB4DC017A3D4E
  • createdAtMillis - 1731123792323
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854999560030208277EC52791536D05BFE8723B04A83961E68B42C57691509F64F5F5FB4DC017A3D4E