Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 23:32:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CB075EE4EBA7087B85317835C937044B96A04BD9CCB246AC9C906B0A8C88913B
Participant Details

Original Note:

About proposed CN from Supreme Watermelon Kestrel, it’s practically impossible to prove a negative assertion such as “there are no reports of…” An appropriate response, instead of a CN, would be to reply to OP and request proof of the OP’s assertion.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854999560030208277
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CB075EE4EBA7087B85317835C937044B96A04BD9CCB246AC9C906B0A8C88913B
  • createdAtMillis - 1731108727102
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854999560030208277CB075EE4EBA7087B85317835C937044B96A04BD9CCB246AC9C906B0A8C88913B