Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 11:16:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0CD75E4903B1F65B1DAE9B56616A5B878B6F841A32F56AF54E580ED77196723
Participant Details

Original Note:

"Limpiar" un rio de cañas no es más que dragar y se sabe que sus supuestos beneficios no son más que un mito. No se extrae la vegetación del cauce ya que frena la corriente, lo cual en este caso ha evitado que la riada fuese a más velocidad. Dejen de desinformar en tragedias. https://www.ebroresilience.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/presentacion-uz_parte-1.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854835785607922098
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0CD75E4903B1F65B1DAE9B56616A5B878B6F841A32F56AF54E580ED77196723
  • createdAtMillis - 1731064594862
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1854835785607922098D0CD75E4903B1F65B1DAE9B56616A5B878B6F841A32F56AF54E580ED77196723