Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-09 08:06:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F5E104AB114D1F78D43D117A8A5143A6C3E9A480D6B3C7F1DA790EAA002F23E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

¿Desde cuando un audio grabado donde se reconocen las voces de ambos implicados no vale como "prueba" por el mero hecho de que la comparta el propio implicado en cuestión? Pésima calidad de NNN justificando que no es válido por el mero hecho de ser publicado por el implicado https://x.com/vitoquiles/status/1854261870548443642?t=YrbI8Eh6w072y8ThBW8h9Q&s=09

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854831811060285552
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F5E104AB114D1F78D43D117A8A5143A6C3E9A480D6B3C7F1DA790EAA002F23E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1731139582923
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854831811060285552F5E104AB114D1F78D43D117A8A5143A6C3E9A480D6B3C7F1DA790EAA002F23E6