Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 15:13:47 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57AF93C94C30E62F00D6C9F0A32AB33DA3CB4712853FB4E7491FB02274FCE4BA
Participant Details

Original Note:

¿Desde cuando un audio grabado donde se reconocen las voces de ambos implicados no vale como "prueba" por el mero hecho de que la comparta el propio implicado en cuestión? Pésima calidad de NNN justificando que no es válido por el mero hecho de ser publicado por el implicado https://x.com/vitoquiles/status/1854261870548443642?t=YrbI8Eh6w072y8ThBW8h9Q&s=09

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854831811060285552
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57AF93C94C30E62F00D6C9F0A32AB33DA3CB4712853FB4E7491FB02274FCE4BA
  • createdAtMillis - 1731078827467
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185483181106028555257AF93C94C30E62F00D6C9F0A32AB33DA3CB4712853FB4E7491FB02274FCE4BA