Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 16:07:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1EF89D3CEFBD555F067AFD6E990ECD809AFA613B7D543E994708161A7E10433D
Participant Details

Original Note:

¿Desde cuando un audio grabado donde se reconocen las voces de ambos implicados no vale como "prueba" por el mero hecho de que la comparta el propio implicado en cuestión? Pésima calidad de NNN justificando que no es válido por el mero hecho de ser publicado por el implicado https://x.com/vitoquiles/status/1854261870548443642?t=YrbI8Eh6w072y8ThBW8h9Q&s=09

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854831811060285552
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1EF89D3CEFBD555F067AFD6E990ECD809AFA613B7D543E994708161A7E10433D
  • createdAtMillis - 1731082048790
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18548318110602855521EF89D3CEFBD555F067AFD6E990ECD809AFA613B7D543E994708161A7E10433D