Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 13:28:23 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D0CD75E4903B1F65B1DAE9B56616A5B878B6F841A32F56AF54E580ED77196723
Participant Details

Original Note:

NN. No sirve invocar gratuitamente que la CREAF es un organismo científico como argumento de autoridad frente a errores contrastados objetivamente. La nota propuesta no expresa ninguna opinión personal, sino que señala hechos objetivos verificables en los que el tuit es falso. https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%A9todo_cient%C3%ADfico

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854828003563376747
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D0CD75E4903B1F65B1DAE9B56616A5B878B6F841A32F56AF54E580ED77196723
  • createdAtMillis - 1731072503506
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1854828003563376747D0CD75E4903B1F65B1DAE9B56616A5B878B6F841A32F56AF54E580ED77196723