Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-12 08:08:01 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C8676694F5458BD6728123F498F4D4C4B05EA6B50E77729C4369C4A83075DA5D
Participant Details

Original Note:

新井元議員に対する名誉毀損は司法の場で認定されており、ローカルルールで判断されたとするポストは誤りです。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20240417-PKQ7QIFH7ZI4PFIU7I3MP6O454/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854825578391883875
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C8676694F5458BD6728123F498F4D4C4B05EA6B50E77729C4369C4A83075DA5D
  • createdAtMillis - 1731398881297
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854825578391883875C8676694F5458BD6728123F498F4D4C4B05EA6B50E77729C4369C4A83075DA5D