Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 09:39:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F70D24A7F6B62D56BF0543AD68D2497CD2A9BEFB328FDD19AB5044F362E42124
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN las fuentes comentadas son llamadas telefónicas cuyo contenido no está probado. Un mero análisis de los tweets y PDFs de la CHJ y de delegación del gobierno demuestra que el barranco del poyo fue ampliamente ignorado. La Consejería se tuvo que enterar por la alcaldesa

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854795783498871206
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F70D24A7F6B62D56BF0543AD68D2497CD2A9BEFB328FDD19AB5044F362E42124
  • createdAtMillis - 1731058766018
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854795783498871206F70D24A7F6B62D56BF0543AD68D2497CD2A9BEFB328FDD19AB5044F362E42124