Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 12:07:34 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 62D286CA14AAEF1FC0C82CFF4F94570B540B97D02C9CD6D3A6EA66250E44E0F3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN las fuentes comentadas son llamadas telefónicas cuyo contenido no está probado. Un mero análisis de los tweets y PDFs de la CHJ y de delegación del gobierno demuestra que el barranco del poyo fue ampliamente ignorado. La Consejería se tuvo que enterar por la alcaldesa

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854795783498871206
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 62D286CA14AAEF1FC0C82CFF4F94570B540B97D02C9CD6D3A6EA66250E44E0F3
  • createdAtMillis - 1731067654527
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185479578349887120662D286CA14AAEF1FC0C82CFF4F94570B540B97D02C9CD6D3A6EA66250E44E0F3