Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-10 17:31:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A2F8CA86748100A8FDA662F22344A415F26143EBF314D73EE0B25781D774F03
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN las fuentes comentadas son llamadas telefónicas cuyo contenido no está probado. Un mero análisis de los tweets y PDFs de la CHJ y de delegación del gobierno demuestra que el barranco del poyo fue ampliamente ignorado. La Consejería se tuvo que enterar por la alcaldesa

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854795783498871206
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A2F8CA86748100A8FDA662F22344A415F26143EBF314D73EE0B25781D774F03
  • createdAtMillis - 1731259912017
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18547957834988712064A2F8CA86748100A8FDA662F22344A415F26143EBF314D73EE0B25781D774F03