Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 02:55:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3F6ACDE842625BF9344041F268E20468B51C8DF7888C8AACBAD39AECAA2D78B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note source is a WSJ opinion piece. Not an appropriate source for Community Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854719178285986191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3F6ACDE842625BF9344041F268E20468B51C8DF7888C8AACBAD39AECAA2D78B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1731034551301
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18547191782859861913F6ACDE842625BF9344041F268E20468B51C8DF7888C8AACBAD39AECAA2D78B1