Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 10:24:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 010FA5912DF84A1F7D768A951E64D58F513B0E0E6AF661FFE0C1642CA20BB15C
Participant Details

Original Note:

Proposed note source is a WSJ opinion piece. Not an appropriate source for Community Notes.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854719178285986191
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 010FA5912DF84A1F7D768A951E64D58F513B0E0E6AF661FFE0C1642CA20BB15C
  • createdAtMillis - 1731061464936
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854719178285986191010FA5912DF84A1F7D768A951E64D58F513B0E0E6AF661FFE0C1642CA20BB15C