Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 06:34:42 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CFA12E9D8F8A31849AB221E19083CCC8C8A4D3A17257F607FF5F426203DD618
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post presents an anecdote, and only as an anecdote, with opinion clearly presented as opinion. The proposed CN presents no evidence that the anecdote is false. There is no factual misstatement here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854638839631167599
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CFA12E9D8F8A31849AB221E19083CCC8C8A4D3A17257F607FF5F426203DD618
  • createdAtMillis - 1731047682449
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18546388396311675994CFA12E9D8F8A31849AB221E19083CCC8C8A4D3A17257F607FF5F426203DD618