Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 07:19:26 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 37A7A1218FBB0E9D36CA3581C47A0A469292EBD04A4A8ED10AB9E2E77117121C
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post presents an anecdote, and only as an anecdote, with opinion clearly presented as opinion. The proposed CN presents no evidence that the anecdote is false. There is no factual misstatement here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854638839631167599
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 37A7A1218FBB0E9D36CA3581C47A0A469292EBD04A4A8ED10AB9E2E77117121C
  • createdAtMillis - 1731050366567
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185463883963116759937A7A1218FBB0E9D36CA3581C47A0A469292EBD04A4A8ED10AB9E2E77117121C