Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 23:15:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0ADDB5F0FAC89CBE6FEE22F5E5BFF89AA7F5878A06CF39154EA40EF584FE5FC9
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post presents an anecdote, and only as an anecdote, with opinion clearly presented as opinion. The proposed CN presents no evidence that the anecdote is false. There is no factual misstatement here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854638839631167599
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0ADDB5F0FAC89CBE6FEE22F5E5BFF89AA7F5878A06CF39154EA40EF584FE5FC9
  • createdAtMillis - 1731107748215
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18546388396311675990ADDB5F0FAC89CBE6FEE22F5E5BFF89AA7F5878A06CF39154EA40EF584FE5FC9