Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-09 13:15:32 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 050E65CEF6101A7671A57AF5754509DD3DC61F7E3DAE2BD69F298B1E470F29ED
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post presents an anecdote, and only as an anecdote, with opinion clearly presented as opinion. The proposed CN presents no evidence that the anecdote is false. There is no factual misstatement here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854638839631167599
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 050E65CEF6101A7671A57AF5754509DD3DC61F7E3DAE2BD69F298B1E470F29ED
  • createdAtMillis - 1731158132215
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854638839631167599050E65CEF6101A7671A57AF5754509DD3DC61F7E3DAE2BD69F298B1E470F29ED