Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-08 08:37:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 00B5B6A5E4F251C0D85888E51408DD9E0CE928774B2AC1A1CE0686E43EDA4530
Participant Details

Original Note:

The post presents an anecdote, and only as an anecdote, with opinion clearly presented as opinion. The proposed CN presents no evidence that the anecdote is false. There is no factual misstatement here.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854638839631167599
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 00B5B6A5E4F251C0D85888E51408DD9E0CE928774B2AC1A1CE0686E43EDA4530
  • createdAtMillis - 1731055059162
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185463883963116759900B5B6A5E4F251C0D85888E51408DD9E0CE928774B2AC1A1CE0686E43EDA4530