Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-07 18:48:09 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 26F372FC8452ECA3F122178C8A1D8DF972AA3882D646839FCD78E2BC65EB6D32
Participant Details

Original Note:

Não houve nenhuma pesquisa ou análise realizada por parte de alguma revista, website ou instituição a qual tenha comparado as três primeiras damas citadas e elegido uma delas como mais bonita. A publicação não cita nenhuma fonte confiável sobre a informação divulgada. https://fotografia.folha.uol.com.br/galerias/20992-a-primeira-dama-mais-bonita-do-brasil

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854566038546899196
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 26F372FC8452ECA3F122178C8A1D8DF972AA3882D646839FCD78E2BC65EB6D32
  • createdAtMillis - 1731005289564
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185456603854689919626F372FC8452ECA3F122178C8A1D8DF972AA3882D646839FCD78E2BC65EB6D32