Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-07 21:28:05 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CDF63E8D5346B13F5E7C8DBC4F6B02C5107DA567110C036148870FA02FFBA1E9
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - it’s an opinion and irrelevant. AP claiming theirs no path is based on the data they have. If however there are votes that were never counted, they wouldn’t be included in the models they have to determine a victor.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854471708914180603
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CDF63E8D5346B13F5E7C8DBC4F6B02C5107DA567110C036148870FA02FFBA1E9
  • createdAtMillis - 1731014885936
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854471708914180603CDF63E8D5346B13F5E7C8DBC4F6B02C5107DA567110C036148870FA02FFBA1E9