Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-07 03:46:14 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5E1F2EF85D85AA5362909FF226739D1E3A39DD99C7CFB2D1FC2819611D8ED82A
Participant Details

Original Note:

合格率は42.13%であり、50%ではありません。 合格率3%の時代の弁護士が、このような数字の見落としをするとは考えにくいことから、恣意的な過大表現とみるべきです。https://news.yahoo.co.jp/articles/b95e825b38215d1936e4b2a2e00bd0562f0619e9

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854361977306689873
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5E1F2EF85D85AA5362909FF226739D1E3A39DD99C7CFB2D1FC2819611D8ED82A
  • createdAtMillis - 1730951174991
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18543619773066898735E1F2EF85D85AA5362909FF226739D1E3A39DD99C7CFB2D1FC2819611D8ED82A