Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-07 02:33:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4A81BCA1F32A51A801DD15716809F9BF4595C1E3EFD8E11578727A2625D1E2DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

No such editorial has been issued by the Washington Post, as of 1816PST 06NOV25: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-posts-view/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854347387038482714
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4A81BCA1F32A51A801DD15716809F9BF4595C1E3EFD8E11578727A2625D1E2DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1730946829904
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18543473870384827144A81BCA1F32A51A801DD15716809F9BF4595C1E3EFD8E11578727A2625D1E2DE