Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-07 13:02:21 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 52D790617B94A221D7B26EA0629E90B941835B6DF24BB204FB4ADF609D9E5BCB
Participant Details

Original Note:

https://www.sankei.com/article/20241106-44YPLYVTQRLU5AOLOO72SZ3GQQ/ リプライや引用ポストには他人の保険証を不正使用したと誤認するものがいくつか見られましたが 本件は居住実態の無い自治体が保険者の本人名義の保険証を使用したことを罪に問われています。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854274478081196228
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 52D790617B94A221D7B26EA0629E90B941835B6DF24BB204FB4ADF609D9E5BCB
  • createdAtMillis - 1730984541044
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 185427447808119622852D790617B94A221D7B26EA0629E90B941835B6DF24BB204FB4ADF609D9E5BCB