Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-10 15:20:22 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3CF1D13F751C9AA4A120E25599DAEFA191F2FB04F73A6ACF614904A7592F33E6
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is little evidence on how surveying biases from a limited poll (2012 responses over 7 days - https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-024-03479-y/27709110) was even considered, let alone accounted for, by Nature. Such analysis should be conducted, and a wider range of views considered, before making these claims.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854250610595627383
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3CF1D13F751C9AA4A120E25599DAEFA191F2FB04F73A6ACF614904A7592F33E6
  • createdAtMillis - 1731252022627
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18542506105956273833CF1D13F751C9AA4A120E25599DAEFA191F2FB04F73A6ACF614904A7592F33E6