Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-07 23:03:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C02E6E0048D484CA8775B860D44B4FFA1931B486948D5B402C4E77B1B5D5F3B3
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Each of the statements made are opinion based. The first is relative to the perspective of the author, the second is the authors opinion on the best next step, the third is the authors optimism considering their view on the previous. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854220726305538077
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C02E6E0048D484CA8775B860D44B4FFA1931B486948D5B402C4E77B1B5D5F3B3
  • createdAtMillis - 1731020598717
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854220726305538077C02E6E0048D484CA8775B860D44B4FFA1931B486948D5B402C4E77B1B5D5F3B3