Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-07 05:51:42 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4CD18BC5752C7C7C4D702C67E574BF9916F79BCB6CD64D492EB3ED9E6390EC54
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN Each of the statements made are opinion based. The first is relative to the perspective of the author, the second is the authors opinion on the best next step, the third is the authors optimism considering their view on the previous. No note needed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854220726305538077
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4CD18BC5752C7C7C4D702C67E574BF9916F79BCB6CD64D492EB3ED9E6390EC54
  • createdAtMillis - 1730958702334
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18542207263055380774CD18BC5752C7C7C4D702C67E574BF9916F79BCB6CD64D492EB3ED9E6390EC54