Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-06 16:14:22 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E0A19CB1B7FCEE58D0378C35AE9D4D6A9E53D293A2A87AA4829253CAB6EEC65D
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the OP posted an opinion, the factual basis for that opinion (66 to 71 in millions of votes) is supported by the very source that the CN listed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854181081282433214
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E0A19CB1B7FCEE58D0378C35AE9D4D6A9E53D293A2A87AA4829253CAB6EEC65D
  • createdAtMillis - 1730909662670
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854181081282433214E0A19CB1B7FCEE58D0378C35AE9D4D6A9E53D293A2A87AA4829253CAB6EEC65D