Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-07 08:24:54 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DF85E2E24F537FB74F43FC6E85A3F0EFEEE2CA6C16EA8C4F3593A90E77F9C171
Participant Details

Original Note:

While the OP posted an opinion, the factual basis for that opinion (66 to 71 in millions of votes) is supported by the very source that the CN listed.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1854181081282433214
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DF85E2E24F537FB74F43FC6E85A3F0EFEEE2CA6C16EA8C4F3593A90E77F9C171
  • createdAtMillis - 1730967894843
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1854181081282433214DF85E2E24F537FB74F43FC6E85A3F0EFEEE2CA6C16EA8C4F3593A90E77F9C171