Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 09:59:31 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4C8C0438E9D904D2D5F6603EA84AE054BC6B144C41A0E03DE0EC2ABCCF5E6C64
Participant Details

Original Note:

確かにキティちゃんは猫ではないし、このノートの訂正例はふふっと笑ってしまう内容で秀逸である上、ポップコーンは美味しいのですが、元ツーイトは特段誤解を招く内容というわけでもないため、ノートの必要はなさそうです。

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1853707998662971502
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4C8C0438E9D904D2D5F6603EA84AE054BC6B144C41A0E03DE0EC2ABCCF5E6C64
  • createdAtMillis - 1730800771577
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 18537079986629715024C8C0438E9D904D2D5F6603EA84AE054BC6B144C41A0E03DE0EC2ABCCF5E6C64