Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2024-11-05 01:19:43 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: B783BF23F5D1EF020C584A6EDDB063B28AAFA5640B490CAC438135CA0DDD29BD
Participant Details

Original Note:

Per the source link; "The group doled out the funds based on who would be the best spokespeople for its pro-Trump agenda, despite the billionaire's assertion that winners would be chosen randomly." https://www.xm.com/au/research/markets/allNews/reuters/pennsylvania-judge-allows-elon-musks-1-million-voter-giveaway-53960233

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1853591970356355452
participantId -
raterParticipantId - B783BF23F5D1EF020C584A6EDDB063B28AAFA5640B490CAC438135CA0DDD29BD
createdAtMillis - 1730769583880
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1853591970356355452B783BF23F5D1EF020C584A6EDDB063B28AAFA5640B490CAC438135CA0DDD29BD